We're pretty sure typical "doctor's orders" don't include flying three days after hip surgery or subjecting yourself to the stress of coaching four days after this surgery. Strong move by Dooley. Now, if they are down ten heading into the 4th quarter and Dooley limps onto the field Willis Reed style and the Vols pull one out...
Knight Commission report has interesting data on job security
Published: Tuesday, 09 October 2012 21:41
A study published by the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics in September ascertains that the turnover rate among FBS head coaches has increased from 16 percent to 19 percent since 2006 (concurrent with the advent of the BCS). At the same time, the turnover rate for FBS athletics directors has dropped from 15 percent to 12 percent.
There are many reasons for this, but the clearest is this: money. While always controversial, the BCS created a rising tide of cash flow across the entire FBS and especially within BCS automatic qualifying conferences. For coaches, more money means more expectations. The higher the expectations placed on a coach, the shorter the leash when the results fall short of what is expected. Our expectation is that this trend will continue when the new playoff system is implemented in 2014.
Money is also the reason FBS athletic directors find themselves enjoying increased job security. Increased bowl payouts and larger television contracts make an athletic directors’ primary job, balancing the budget, easier.
-In real numbers, there were 19 new hires across FBS in 1992. This number grew to 21 in 1999 and then dropped to 17 four years later, only to climb to 23 hires in 2007 and 25 in both 2010 and 2011.
-Meanwhile, the number of FBS ADs changing jobs peaked at 21 in 1995 and steadily declined since. In 2011, only five FBS schools hired new athletic directors. In fact, in 2011 there were nine more changes in head coaching positions (25) than ADs (five) and university presidents (11) combined.
-The study also details that head football coaches experience a lower term expectancy than their bosses on campus. In 2007, an FBS head coach could expect to stay on the job for an average of 6.59 years, close to a year less than the athletic director (7.98) and president (7.49).
-Interestingly enough, head coaches and athletic directors enjoyed more job expectancy at the AQ level than non-AQ. In 2011 an AQ athletic director had been on the job an average of 9.46 years, compared to 6.13 at non-AQ schools. Similarly, AQ head coaches averaged 7.09 years on the job versus a 6.11 average at non-AQ programs.
The Knight Commission study also chronicled the rise in “off-the-field personnel.” The amount of titled football operations directors and video coordinators has exploded over the last 20 years, rising sharply with the advent of the BCS.
-In 1991 there were zero video coordinators in major college football and only two football operations directors. Four years later tha number of video coordinators exploded to 59, while football operations directors remained rare (15). Fast forward to 2007 each position had become an essential member of staffs across the country, as schools employed 124 football operations directors and 117 video coordinators.
-As DFOs have become more commonplace across college football their standing within the athletic department has slowly risen. For instance of the 91 football operations directors in college football in 2003, 76 held director of operations titles while a mere 15 carried titles including associate/assistant athletic director. That number has nearly doubled in the near decade since, growing to 29 in 2011, but still stood at less than a quarter of all DFO personnel in FBS.
After a 3-0 start, UCLA (4-2) has dropped two out of their last three (week 5 win at Colorado is sandwiched by losses to Oregon State and Cal).
In each of their wins (against Rice, Nebraska, Houston and Colorado), UCLA has scored at least 36 points. In their two losses the Bruins have failed to reach the 21 point mark.
We also noticed that in each of their four wins this season, the Bruins have rushed for over 210 yards. In both of their losses they have struggled to get the run game going, failing to reach the 130 yard mark both times. This weekend they will face an experienced Utah defensive line that has allowed only one team to run for more than 100 net yards (Northern Colorado in week 1 had 193 net yards rushing).
Mora noted during his press conference after practice today that their run game scheme going into each week is simple, and couldn't get much more basic. He reminded his coaches this week that it's important to not over-coach their young and inexperienced guys up front.
Other than focusing on the guy across the line of scrimmage, Mora explained that they'll continue to put a renewed focus on their fundamentals in the run game. Mora said that offensive line coach Adrian Klemm has returned to stressing the fundamental footwork, and the correct hand and eye position that will lead back to the run game success that they saw the first three weeks of the season.
"What you try to do is not make it too big for them. I think sometimes you can over-coach in terms of emphasis on the other guy instead of emphasis on yourself. I think Adrian does a really good job of bringing it back to our fundamentals and our technique, our calls, playing the way that we're supposed to play and not making it so much about them." Mora explained.
BC has a new AD - What that means for the football staff
Published: Tuesday, 09 October 2012 14:03
Miami (Ohio) athletic director Brad Bates was announced this afternoon as the new athletic director at Boston College. Bates, who had been at Miami for a decade (and was at Vanderbilt for over 15 years prior to that), now holds the future of Boston College's football program in his hands.
When he gets to know the current staff, he'll find a likable and capable set of coaches; but also one that for whatever reason hasn't been able to obtain the success that they would like on the field. It's hard to imagine any scenario in which Bates isn't selecting the new head coach for the Eagles within the next 60 days.
No one truly knows how the selection process will unfold; but one name that can't be dismissed from consideration is Mike Haywood. Bates hired Haywood in December 2008 to turnaround Miami's faltering football program. In his first season Haywood's team went 1-11; but in their second season, the Redhawks went 8-1 in conference and 9-4 overall. Haywood was hired to be Pitt's head coach but was released from that contract shortly after his hiring following a domestic dispute (the charges would later be dismissed). Haywood and Bates remain close and have a very effective working relationship.
Haywood is Catholic (which is relevant at BC); but far more important is his overall body of work as a coach. His early stops in his career were at Army, Ohio and Ball State. He then had a long run as running backs & special teams coordinator at LSU and then at Texas. From 2005 - 2008 he served as running backs coach / offensive coordinator at Notre Dame. At each spot he garnered accolades for his rapport both with his players and his fellow coaches.
Haywood is currently out of football; but that won't be the case a few months from now. He loves coaching and wants back in. We don't know if he gets back in as a head coach; but we're very confident that Bates has confidence in Haywood and will consider him for a position at BC in the future.
There is a long, long list of guys who like to be the head coach at Boston College and we're by no means saying Haywood is a shoe-in; but he's on the proverbial list.